skip to the main content area of this page
Home
Jobs Boards
Message Boards
In the News
Advertise With Us
This website is not affiliated with any government agency.
USPTO Examiners
TM
We Examine the Examiners
Home
[
Login
]
Home
Job Boards
Register
Job Search
Legal Notice
Privacy Policy
Message Boards
Register
Post Message
Message Search
Legal Organizations
Law Firms
Law Schools
In The News
Advertise With Us
Contact Us
Links
Latest Posts
Patent Examiners
Add Post
Baldwin couple arrested, charged with identity theft
(ANAND S JAILALL) (GROUP ART UNIT 4173 ) 8/27/2008
Helpful
(BENJAMIN LAYNO) (GROUP ART UNIT 3711 ) 8/19/2008
Organized, coherent rejection - overall good work product
(JAMES S WOZNIAK) (GROUP ART UNIT 2626 ) 8/13/2008
Awful - no understanding of the law, rules, or the technology
(JOSEPH (JOE) D WONG) (GROUP ART UNIT 2168 ) 8/5/2008
MORON
(ANDREW W SUTTON) (GROUP ART UNIT 3765 ) 8/4/2008
Trademark Examiners
Add Post
Rude
(MICHAEL R TANNER ) (LAW OFFICE 117 ) 8/27/2008
Law Firms
Add Post
Oliff and Berridge
Anonymous 8/26/2008
Attorneys that waste examiners time
Anonymous 8/26/2008
Attorneys that don't return phone calls
Anonymous 8/1/2008
Oblan Spivak, aka The Worthless Firm that Requests Personal Interviews ad nauseum.
Anonymous 7/31/2008
Worst Firm - An Examiner's Perspective.
bababooey 7/29/2008
General Discussions
Add Post
Infinite retreat
Anonymous 8/6/2008
Requests and Suggestions
Add Post
View all posts
Recent Jobs
View all jobs
Breaking News
View all news
Our Mission
USPTO Examiners is a website designed for professionals to anonymously review, rank, and learn about a patent examiner or a trademark examining attorney who works at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
Patent examiners and trademark examining attorneys are public employees who help determine the technological and economical future growth of each industry and business in the world. A simple word such as “allowed” or “rejected” from a patent examiner or a trademark examining attorney could grow or financially burden a company, business, or individual. Accordingly, it is extremely important for the USPTO to have well trained patent examiners and trademark examining attorneys who understand that each of their decisions could benefit and/or harm an industry, business, and/or individual. Having highly competent patent examiners and trademark examining attorneys will result in the USPTO issuing high quality patents and trademarks.
Patent and trademark practitioners who deal with individual patent examiners and trademark examining attorneys are in the best position to express their opinions (e.g., their concerns, as well as their satisfaction) about each patent examiner or trademark examining attorney. Individuals who refer to this website may factor in the opinions of the patent and trademark practitioners when determining the competency and responsiveness of a particular patent examiner or trademark examining attorney. As such, these opinions could be a valuable tool when planning and strategizing a prosecution of a patent or trademark case, which can result in saving clients and inventors a substantial amount of time and money during the course of prosecuting a patent or a trademark.
Accordingly, this website has been developed to form an online collaborative environment in which members of professional organizations, corporations, and inventors may anonymously pool their experiences and opinions about a patent examiner or a trademark examining attorney, including their knowledge of the law and technology, as well as their accessibility.
Your opinions are completely anonymous. You are only required to make a user name and a password to post an opinion about an individual patent examiner or a trademark examining attorney. We do not require that you reveal your identity or provide any identifying information when making a user name and password to make a posting.
USPTO Examiners appreciates the time that patent and trademark practitioners take to post their anonymous opinions.